Profile: Erin Lamm

            It’s not easy to get students to show up to a 3pm class on a Friday. Erin Lamm has a full house. Fifteen students sit in a small classroom in Boston University’s College of Arts and Sciences, some fiddling with their iPhones and some lying draped over their desks. All eyes are on the clock. If the professor doesn’t show up in 15 minutes, they can leave. Just under, at 3:09, Lamm (Madame to her students) rolls in—literally, she’s in a motorized chair. The room transforms: the air of disappointment quickly dissipates when she apologizes for her lateness, cracks a joke with her boisterous laugh, and gets the class started.

            Erin Lamm, a graduate student and senior teaching fellow at Boston University, has cerebral palsy—a disability that severely affects her muscle control and speech. It doesn’t slow her down. After studying French literature at Drew University and receiving her masters from Columbia University, she applied to graduate school at Boston University to complete her Ph.D. Since then she has made a home in Boston. “I always knew someday I would end up here,” she says, although her apartment—with its classic European feel, gold-framed French posters on each white wall, and French magazines stacked in every corner—might make you think you’re in France. 

            Since the beginning of her career, Lamm has taught 100-level French classes, and this spring will teach a 200-level course for the first time. Though she enjoys “giving students their first impression of France” in entry-level courses, she is happy to be moving to third semester French and is looking forward to working with more difficult material. When she first arrived on campus, she “team-taught” first semester French with long-time French professor Susan Dorff—an experience she found frustrating at times, but one that strengthened her own teaching style. She also observed Professor Davina Mattox’s class every week, finding inspiration in Mattox’s extensive preparation for each class and learning to enjoy teaching. The two have collaborated in previous semesters, and will again in the spring. “I can’t wait to work with Erin again,” Mattox says. “She’s always willing to share new ways of presenting materials; she’s not selfish with what she creates. It’s incredible, what she’s able to do. Her French is better than mine sometimes!” (Mattox is a native speaker; Lamm is not.) “She’s so creative; she comes up with things I would never be able to think of.”

Deeply integrated into Lamm’s teaching is her interest in French literature and film, which has led to some of her proudest accomplishments. She played an integral role in the 2012 and 2013 Tournées Film Festivals at BU and her article “La force féminine dans Lettres d’une Péruvienne et Gigi” will be published in the upcoming volume of L’Érudite Franco-Espagnol. The article, researched in Paris and Burgundy during her time at Columbia, analyzes the voice of women in two famous French works, Lettres d’une Péruvienne (“Letters of a Peruvian”) and Gigi, a coming-of-age story about a Parisian woman. “Getting my article accepted was my proudest moment,” she says, beaming, and calls her time researching it in Paris the best experience of her life. There she participated in a program that was not handicapped accessible, and received a unique view of the city from a personal tour guide. While in Paris, she also met French anthropologist Anaís Louis Chabanier, with whom she has sustained a ten-year close friendship. Lamm attributes much of her teaching style to Chabanier’s influence. “She always said, ‘teach everyday life and culture.’” And so she does.

            Lamm’s classroom is not a typical one. Because of her disability, she has to find new strategies and ways of teaching. Her class is based on visuals and powerpoint slides—Lamm’s assistant controls the computer, slave to her every “next!”—as well as activities that require participation, such as group projects. She often pairs students to do small activities, and moves around the room, her right hand poised over her chair’s remote, ready to speed towards anyone with a question for her. Her fingers, though they have what is called “swan-neck deformity,” causing her knuckles to be slightly inverted, are well polished and decorated with thick silver rings. She glides around the room, attending to every question and correcting every mistake.

She makes sure to establish open communication with her students—in French as much as possible—and doesn’t hesitate to reach out to them individually. “Ten culture points!” she exclaims when a students tells her about having seen a French movie over the weekend, referring to the extra credit system she uses to encourage students to expand their French education outside the classroom. Spencer Wardwell, a former student of Lamm’s, remembers, “she was very encouraging of my passion for film. She once let me do a film project for extra credit, and when I got a freelance cinematography job, she was very happy for me.” He shrugs, “she’s the best.” It seems to be a common sentiment.

            When asked if any significant teaching moments stand out to her, she can’t think of any; or rather, she can’t pick one. “I feel like I couldn’t top the way I taught 112,” she says of her close class of six last semester. “My philosophy of teaching is to motivate students to understand and enjoy more difficult material, which I felt I accomplished.” She’s ready for something new, and though it will be a challenge, it is a welcome one. “Every challenge I’ve faced has brought out something great in me. I have to ask a lot of people for a lot of help,” she says. “But as a result I have been able to get to know many wonderful people.” This attitude is woven into every aspect of her life and inspires her teaching—to her, education is most effective and meaningful on a human level. She encourages in her students the same appreciation she has for travel and the building of relationships, and allows them to experience France, as she puts it, “beyond the post-card version of it.” 

Standard

Chapter 7: Writing About Others~Profiles

An ordinary life examined closely reveals itself to be exquisite and complicated, somehow managing to be both heroic and plain.

I must admit, this assignment is the one that scares me the most. Hopefully this chapter can help me out, because I have zero clue how I’m going to do this.

“A profile is a portrait in words.” Show, not tell–I’ve heard that before.

Step 1: find a profile subject. Haven’t done this yet. This person should represent a career, trend, philosophy, or lifestyle. I have a feeling this person will end up being a musician, because I’m fascinated by them and, in my experience, can’t seem to get away from them. I’ve never conducted an interview, but I know how to ask questions about music.

One page in and I’m learning the difference between a profile and a biography. 

Wait! Maybe I want to do the profile on my French teacher last semester. She is one of the most interesting people I’ve ever met; why didn’t I think of this before?! Duh. Forget musicians. Now I’m excited.

Okay, back to the book. I know I’ve mentioned this before, but I find the “Anatomy of a (fill in the blank: memoir, news story, film review, profile)” section extremely helpful. It’s easy to glaze over an example without really reading it, but with these the red notes keep me paying attention. It’s also a million times more helpful to see an example of a “nut graf” (what?) than simply a definition.

Stuff to throw in:

  • physical description
  • quotations
  • quotations about the subject
  • examples
  • anecdotes
  • factual information (background and context)

Research paths:

  • Social media
  • Online searches and databases
  • Direct observation
  • Interviews (the big one: start early, set it up in subject’s workplace/home, make a contact list, do your homework, prepare, conduct, observe, transcribe, read. Got it.)

I loved the Powers profile. It was hilarious. It reminded me of a similarly terrifying teacher I had in high school, whose class I loved, and made me wish Powers still taught here. (Actually I don’t know for a fact whether he does or doesn’t…I’ll look into it)

I went into this chapter in a panic, with absolutely no idea who I would be writing about, and came out of it with a subject and psyched to get started. I think it worked.

Standard

Chapter Ten: Writing an Evaluation

I love film. I love movies, TV, all of it. Unfortunately, I know absolutely nothing about it, and I’ve always wanted to know more about the elements of film. This chapter helped me out. Reading it was considerably easier to read than previous chapters; it was magically informative without being dull.

Interesting bits:

Ty Burr’s review of Avatar. I remember the anticipation of the film (the “kool-aid” as Burr calls it) and the mixed response to it. I personally walked out of the theater amazed by the visuals but feeling like I’d just seen a glorified Pocahontas. Burr’s reaction to the film was similar, but stated a bit more eloquently. The side comments were helpful in pointing out how he did what I couldn’t–explain why. His analysis of the special effects, plot, and Cameron’s abilities, in my opinion, were spot on.

The director of Slumdog Millionaire ensuring the movie’s child actors completed their education. A cool tidbit, unrelated to the plot or characters or visuals, but which might influence those who had made negative assumptions about the film’s productions incentive to see it.

Mise en scene examples: Bill Murray, sticking out like a sore thumb in a crowded elevator in Lost in Translation, Nicole Kidman and Ewan McGregor in a passionate embrace in front of elaborate heart-shaped scenery in Moulin Rouge, Ellen Page’s baby bump front and center in Juno, a stunned Dev Patel surrounded by celebration in Slumdog Millionaire

DIY Media and Design, and the insight into writing film scripts

The three varying reviews of Fight Club and The Departed

Helpful bits:

The Q&A with Ty Burr.

Analysis of theme + your evaluation of execution = evaluative thesis

The elements of film broken down:

  • story elements: character (lines, delivery, acting) and plot (development, pace)
  • visual elements: cinematography (how the movie is filmed), editing (creating a cohesive final product), production design (sets, costumes, props), special effects (animation digital design, stunts)
  • sound elements: the soundtrack (my personal favorite)

And the most important bit:

The Review = plot summary + evaluation

1. plot summary: brief, concise, no spoilers

2. evaluation: the rave, the pan, and the mixed review

Key players: producer, director, writer, actors, cinematographer, editor

All of the things I have to remember to think about and take notes on when I go see the film I’m reviewing (movie TBD):

background information, context

story, characters, acting, direction, editing, cinematography, sound effects, music, costumes, visual impact

All of the things I have to remember to write about in the film review I’m writing:

introduction–context, thesis (evaluation of film), brief summary

body–analyze elements of film, determine film’s strengths and weaknesses

conclusion–worthwhile to see?

 

Standard

Chapter 11: Writing a Causal Analysis

This chapter is about writing about trends and explaining them, and it is loaded with info. This blog looks a little more like notes than a blog. Old habits die hard.

I liked reading the example piece about social media in college admissions, and the side notes are helpful (sometimes obvious, but it’s nice to see each element pointed out). I found it interesting that the author originally had another topic in mind but changed direction.

Tips from the chapter:

  • proof the trend exists then explain the trend
  • Establish ethos: understand your audience–know what they do and do not know, and whether or not it is a controversial matter
  • present yourself as an authority–use precise data, interviews, consult sources, quote exports
  • objective voice–no first person! no opinion and attribution

Choosing a good topic: make observations and convert them to analysis

This, I think, is the hardest part: finding a topic that will work for the assignment and that will be  interesting  (to readers and the author). I like the texting example because it is such a major trend but I feel like the ways in which it has changed communication are pretty much common knowledge so I’m not sure what additional insight a causal analysis could provide. This is why you should test your topic: is it isolated or other examples? Are there larger implications? Are there noteworthy increases/decreases? What are the significant cause or effects?

The Analytical Thesis: define the trend and present a theory about it–signals what your readers will understand by reading your analysis

Keep track of research: books, social media, internet search engines and directories, internet databases, interviews and check for authority, currency, bias

I found the advice about “showing the human side of data” intriguing because when I think data, I don’t really think “personal”. But for someone to be included in a data figure, they must have had a personal experience with the trend. I like the idea of using the story within the data rather than simply a large impersonal numerical figure.

Using logic: avoid jumping to conclusions!

  • post hoc fallacy–that something that happens is a cause of what comes after it
  • correlation does not prove causation

So, if I fall asleep after this, it does not necessarily mean it was because this chapter was boring. Assuming so would be falling prey to the post hoc fallacy.

Revision: big idea reminders, restatements of previous topics, single word transitions

“Race Remixed Black? White? Asian? More Young Americans Choose All of the Above” and the other readings tie all the elements of the chapter together. They present trends and explain them using personal stories and relevant statistics.

Standard

Chapter 13: Creating a Visual Argument

Let me preface this: I know absolutely nothing about film. I can barely take a decent video on my iPhone’s camera. So this could either be a really great learning experience or a disaster. Fingers crossed it’s the first.

…That was unnecessary, as it turns out, because this chapter wasn’t about film. It was about PSAs, and film is the media we’ll be using, but the chapter mainly focused on getting the message across. I hadn’t realized before how every aspect of a public service message conveys meaning, even down to small details such as the size and font of the text.

In the Q&A with Tom Fauls, he advises focusing on the client’s objective, how the target audience (and only the target audience) will react, smart and original ideas that are relevant, and emotional motivators.

The chapter also talks about the “big concept”: the main message your PSA is trying to send, which is narrowed down to a specific message aimed at the target audience.

Persuasion path: attract attention and generate interest, appeal to hearts and minds, provide reasons, call to action

I’m trying to think of PSAs that have captured my attention in the past, and they seem to follow the formula this book gives. Each one has been interesting visually, had a catchy tagline, made me laugh, or was hard-hitting (like those brutal descriptions of deaths in drunk driving accidents).

I understand all of these concepts, like pathos, appealing to emotion, logos, using logic, and ethos. The difficulty will be in figuring out how to use them differently–in a way that’s not cliché or overdone.

Standard

Documentation

According to Writing in the Works, attributing sources gives writing credibility. (I’m currently hyper-aware of the fact that I’m paraphrasing, and it’s giving me anxiety.) When you consult other resources in your research, they must receive credit; if they do not you are plagiarizing. The punishments for plagiarism are really, really scary. I’ll be reading this chapter very closely.

How to avoid plagiarism: take careful notes, use quotation marks, write down citation. Reading this is giving me flashbacks of high school research papers and those dreaded bibliography notecards. 

“The ethics of research demand absolute honesty in reporting information from your sources” (Blau and Burak 504). This means that along with avoiding plagiarism, you must also make sure your quotations are completely accurate.

To document or not to document? Quotations, yes. Intellectual property, yes. Music, yes. General knowledge, no. Historical facts, commonly accepted opinions, information found in many reference sources, and commonly known proverbs all fit under umbrella. 

Once you’ve done your research, you must decide how to write about it. Too little citations and your work isn’t credible; too many and you’ve done no original thinking. The key is to find the balance using the three ways of using information: quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing. All are ways to incorporate research into your writing, and all need citations. When in doubt, cite.

 

Standard

Chapter 9: Writing a Report

Journalism is literature in a hurry.

This one will be a challenge for me. Material wise it’s a bit easier, I suppose: it does not require the soul searching and time spent lying awake thinking I had to do in order to come up with the subject of my memoir. For the news story I’ll have to find a lecture or event–that I’m interested in but not involved with–but I’m actually kind of excited about this. The problem will be writing about it. Where the memoir was more free, news writing has a specific voice. I’ve been told I have a pretty distinct writing style, and have been instructed to rein it in a bit for the few pieces of formal writing I’ve done–research papers, newspaper features here and there. I tend to be wordy and write long sentences. Not quite the clear and concise writing necessary for an effective news story. Objectivity is also uncharted territory for me; I’ll have to focus on this in my revisions, I’m sure. In the social media section he book suggests I “think about how you would draw the attention of people in a crowded bar if you had to shout out a single sentence.” I like this idea.

I’ll definitely be reading more news stories to get used to this voice. I just changed my homepage to the New York Times website. Does osmosis work?

Standard

Chapter 2: The Writer’s Process

You can’t wait for inspiration. You have to go after it with a club.

I was dreading that. This quote reminds me of a poem I once read that called inspiration “an elusive mistress”. I’m not sure why, but it stuck with me. Reading it I thought, how awful for creative people! How horrible to have to wait around to be struck with an idea and to be depressed and feel like a failure if you’re not inspired. The poet is no helpless victim, however; at the end, she writes, “those who live and die by the strike of her match . . . kick her to the curb.” Basically, screw inspiration and put in the work. Cue the writer’s process.

So this chapter is talking about the writing process, in no specific terms. It manifests itself differently for everyone, and as I read I’m trying to figure out what mine is, or if I even have one. I suppose I do–it tends to be more recursive than linear, without prerequisites other than a cup of coffee. I’m also finding out that brainstorming is not something I do consciously, and maybe should. I’m gonna give these freewriting and clustering things a try I think. Listing I’m well familiar with, but my outlines usually end up being scratched out and rearranged and disregarded. Of course I brainstorm; I just don’t see it as a separate step. With ideas floating around in my head (and sometimes scribbled in my notebook or on napkins or on my hand), I tend to like to sit in front of a blank document and just go. This may not be the best approach, I realize, but it works for me.

So then we have the research path. Although I don’t need to do research per se to write a memoir, which I’ll be doing very soon if I can force myself not to rely on inspiration (which tends to hit at midnight the night before a due date, thanks a lot), I have been spending some time soul searching since it was assigned. I just tried out the question and answer research tactic, and it surprised me. To every question I asked–what gave you a change of heart? What was a discovery, a decision, a disappointment?–the answer was the same. Every single one. It was something I hadn’t even considered writing about for my memoir, but now I see it’s the clearest option and probably the best one.

I hadn’t considered it before because I didn’t see it as a story or a life-changing moment; but it is the thing that has caused the most personal growth and the most change in my life. It’s not a single event, and there’s not much logical progression to it; I worried that it wasn’t quite a story. But reading this chapter has given me ideas on how to write it as one. With the right structure and rhetorical devices (I’ll probably be leaning on narration, description, and cause/effect most heavily), I think I can make it a good one.

Standard

Chapter 6: Writing a Narrative~Memoirs

Say that again? I have to write a memoir? Who am I to write a memoir? Aren’t those for, you know, important people? People who have accomplished things? Or are ahead of me in the life experience department by miles? Stop. Calm down. Read the chapter.

 Oh. I think I may have had a misunderstanding of what exactly a memoir is–I had been envisioning those books on the bestseller shelves of Barnes & Noble with close-ups of public figures’ somber faces and dark bold print shouting from the covers. As I read, it’s looking less and less like I’m going to have to write a tell-all novel about my entire life. The chapter tells me a memoir is a true event or series of related events told like a story, involving “a change of mind or heart, a discovery, a confirmation or contradiction of a belief, a disappointment or decision.” I’ve had those! Lots of them! Options start running through my head; moments–proud, sad, traumatic, seemingly insignificant–are swirling around. Pause. Write some down so I don’t forget them. Figure out which ones are important later. 

Next there’s an example. It’s called All Washed Up. This author isn’t talking about losing a presidential election or winning a Nobel Prize or surviving the apocalypse. She’s simply talking about a work experience which gave her a wake up call, and about being eighteen and naïve, and she has something important to say, something a student sitting in a coffee shop blogging for her Com class can understand and relate to. I guess I am capable of writing one of these…

I wish I could write with style like the fired waitress, with heartbreaking brevity like Hemingway, with beautiful imagery like the girl in the cold. I wish I could tell poignant stories with my illustrations like Marjane Satrapi, or humbly convey emotions of as daunting an experience as having to serve as a juror on a murder trial. I wish I could make readers laugh with “dark humor” like David Sedaris’. I probably can’t.

But what I can do is build a story about a significant experience I’ve had using the formula I’ve been taught since English class in grade school (intro-rising action-climax-resolution), weave in familiar vocab terms like voice and tone and theme, and, with my newfound understanding of them (like when to show and when to tell), make it mean something, both for me and for readers.

 Last page. Revision checklist. Worry about that later.

 Here goes.

Standard